A Dane County judge has refused to let Wisconsin voters who already mailed in an absentee ballot show up at the polls on Election Day and vote again. On Tuesday, October 6, Circuit Judge Rhonda Lanford denied the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin’s request for a temporary injunction that would have changed the rules for the November 3 election, leaving the state’s long-standing ballot-finality law in place.
The ruling is not the end of the lawsuit. But with Election Day less than a month away, it means the rules voters were told about are the rules that will apply.
What the League wanted
The League sued the Wisconsin Elections Commission in July 2026, along with a Dane County voter. The case, League of Women Voters of Wisconsin v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, targets commission guidance that tracks a plain sentence in state law. Wisconsin Statute 6.86(6) says: “An elector who mails or personally delivers an absentee ballot to the municipal clerk at an election is not permitted to vote in person at the same election on election day.”
The League’s argument rests on the mail. Wisconsin requires absentee ballots to reach election officials by 8 p.m. on Election Day, with no grace period for late delivery. According to Votebeat, a Wisconsin Elections Commission survey found that two-thirds of clerks saw absentee mail delivery problems in the April election. Democracy Docket reported that all 336 absentee ballots that arrived in Milwaukee the day after the spring election were rejected, and that more than 100 late ballots went uncounted in Fond du Lac.
So the League asked the court to let voters who feared their mailed ballot would arrive late cast a provisional ballot in person on Election Day, as a backup in case the first ballot never arrived. According to Democracy Docket, its complaint says the policy would “forbid[s] Wisconsinites from exercising their right to vote.”
Why that is a problem
Put plainly, the request was to let one voter put two ballots into the system and sort it out afterward. The law forbids exactly that, and for good reason. Once a ballot is mailed, it is in the custody of the Postal Service and then the clerk. Letting the same voter cast a second ballot at the polls invites confusion over which one counts, and it adds work for poll workers on the busiest day of the year.
Republican State Rep. Calvin Callahan of Tomahawk intervened in the case to defend the statute, and the court granted his motion. “I got into this case to defend the law the Legislature wrote,” Callahan said in a statement after the ruling. “If you mail your absentee ballot back to your clerk, you do not get another vote at the polls.” His summary of the law was three words: “One person, one ballot.”
He also took aim at the timing: “Voters in the Northwoods play by the rules. They should not have the rules changed on them by an outside lawsuit three weeks before Election Day.” Callahan added: “I will stay in this case until it is finished.”
What the court did, and didn’t, decide
Judge Lanford denied the temporary injunction and declined, for now, to rule on the League’s motion for summary judgment. That means the case remains pending, but Democracy Docket reported that any ruling on the merits would likely come after the midterms. For this election, Wisconsin’s rule stands: one absentee ballot, returned on time, and no second vote at the polls.
The practical answer to slow mail is for voters to return ballots early or hand-deliver them, not for courts to rewrite election law weeks before the vote.
The second time this year
This is not the first time in 2026 that a Dane County judge has told litigants that a returned Wisconsin ballot is final. In July, Judge David Conway rejected a suit by three Democratic voters who had cast absentee ballots for Lt. Gov. Sara Rodriguez before she dropped out of the Democratic primary for governor, and who wanted to spoil those ballots and vote again. According to WPR, Conway wrote that state law lets absentee voters exchange a spoiled ballot before they return it, “But it does not mean (they) can still ‘spoil’ their ballots after they have returned them.” He added: “At no time before or after July 9, did the law allow absentee voters to spoil their returned ballots.” The Republican National Committee had intervened in that case, and Chairman Joe Gruters called the outcome a defeat for “Democrats’ ballot do-over scheme.”
Two suits, two different theories, and the same answer from the bench both times. Wisconsin’s Legislature wrote a clear rule, and judges are reading it as written.
A ballot is a decision, not a draft, and Wisconsin just reminded everyone that you only get to cast it once.
Sources
- Wisconsin State Legislature: Wis. Stat. 6.86(6)
- WisPolitics: Callahan campaign: Court sides with Callahan, rejects last-minute push to let voters cast two ballots (Oct. 7, 2026)
- Votebeat: Wisconsin officials call for prompt ballot return after court rules against backup plan for late mail (Oct. 14, 2026)
- Democracy Docket: In blow to mail voters, Wisconsin judge won't allow provisional ballots for people fearing Postal Service delays (Oct. 8, 2026)
- WPR: Judge rejects attempt to let absentee voters recast ballots after candidates withdraw (July 29, 2026)
- RNC: RNC scores major Wisconsin election integrity victory (July 29, 2026)
More from The Rothman Report
Lifelong Democrat Sheriff Quits the Party After Locals Told Him to Leave for Backing Rogers and James
Taco Bell Coworker’s Tip Stopped a Self-Described Neo-Nazi’s Alleged Plot Against an Aurora Hindu Temple
Paralympian Veteran Waited 5 Years for a Wheelchair Lift. She Says Canada Offered Her Assisted Death.