Latest
2 hours agoLifelong Democrat Sheriff Quits the Party After Locals Told Him to Leave for Backing Rogers and James2 hours agoTaco Bell Coworker’s Tip Stopped a Self-Described Neo-Nazi’s Alleged Plot Against an Aurora Hindu Temple4 hours agoParalympian Veteran Waited 5 Years for a Wheelchair Lift. She Says Canada Offered Her Assisted Death.4 hours agoGlenview Teen Shot Dead at Home: Sheriff Says Evidence Is There, Cook County Still Won’t Charge5 hours agoRhode Island Ruled Him Incompetent for 23 Years and Let Him Walk. Now a Toddler Was Stabbed in Her Stroller.5 hours agoHistorian Recounts Digging Through a Building Floor on Tarawa to Bring 11 Missing Americans Home5 hours agoHe Says He Refused a DNR for His Wife Five Times. The Hospital Put It on Her Chart Anyway.10 hours agoIDF Kills Hamas Weapons Commander Who Infiltrated Israel on October 711 hours agoTrump Calls Zelensky ‘P.T. Barnum,’ Says Biden-Era Missiles Were ‘Sold on the Open Market’11 hours agoNew Jersey Deputy Attorney General Charged With Using AI to Create and Share Child Sexual Abuse Material12 hours agoPowder-Filled Letters Hit Election Offices in at Least 15 States and Senate Offices Weeks Before the Midterms16 hours agoArmed Community Member Stopped Oregon School Gunman Within Minutes. Even CNN Said ‘Thank God for That Person.’2 hours agoLifelong Democrat Sheriff Quits the Party After Locals Told Him to Leave for Backing Rogers and James2 hours agoTaco Bell Coworker’s Tip Stopped a Self-Described Neo-Nazi’s Alleged Plot Against an Aurora Hindu Temple4 hours agoParalympian Veteran Waited 5 Years for a Wheelchair Lift. She Says Canada Offered Her Assisted Death.4 hours agoGlenview Teen Shot Dead at Home: Sheriff Says Evidence Is There, Cook County Still Won’t Charge5 hours agoRhode Island Ruled Him Incompetent for 23 Years and Let Him Walk. Now a Toddler Was Stabbed in Her Stroller.5 hours agoHistorian Recounts Digging Through a Building Floor on Tarawa to Bring 11 Missing Americans Home5 hours agoHe Says He Refused a DNR for His Wife Five Times. The Hospital Put It on Her Chart Anyway.10 hours agoIDF Kills Hamas Weapons Commander Who Infiltrated Israel on October 711 hours agoTrump Calls Zelensky ‘P.T. Barnum,’ Says Biden-Era Missiles Were ‘Sold on the Open Market’11 hours agoNew Jersey Deputy Attorney General Charged With Using AI to Create and Share Child Sexual Abuse Material12 hours agoPowder-Filled Letters Hit Election Offices in at Least 15 States and Senate Offices Weeks Before the Midterms16 hours agoArmed Community Member Stopped Oregon School Gunman Within Minutes. Even CNN Said ‘Thank God for That Person.’
One Democrat broke ranks, and the Iran war powers resolution died 49-50.

Photo: Governor Tom Wolf from Harrisburg, PA / CC BY 2.0 (source)

Fetterman Casts the Deciding Vote as the Senate Sinks Another Iran War Powers Resolution, 49-50

by
M.A. Rothman

By M.A. RothmanSeptember 25, 2026 · 5 min read
𝕏f

The Senate on Thursday, September 24, 2026, rejected another attempt to order American forces out of the war with Iran, and the margin was a single vote. The measure failed 49 to 50, and the senator who made the difference was a Democrat: John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, the only member of his party to vote no.

Had Fetterman voted with the rest of his caucus, the resolution would have passed 50 to 49. He didn’t, and on the Senate’s 14th vote on the question since the war began, the effort to tie the president’s hands came up short again.

What the Senate actually voted on

The measure was a House concurrent resolution, H. Con. Res. 89, which the House adopted 214 to 208. Its operative line read: “Congress hereby directs the President to remove the use of United States Armed Forces from hostilities” against the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Because it was a concurrent resolution, it would never have gone to President Trump’s desk. As CBS News noted, it could not be signed or vetoed, and administrations of both parties have argued that such resolutions are unconstitutional and cannot bind the president. In other words, even a win would have been mostly a statement. But statements matter in wartime, and the regime in Tehran reads American headlines as closely as anyone.

Four Republicans crossed over to support it: Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Thom Tillis of North Carolina. For Tillis, who is leaving the Senate early next year, it was the first time he backed one of these measures. According to CBS, he pointed to the fact that 60 days had passed since the administration notified Congress in July that military action against Iran had restarted. Pennsylvania’s Republican senator, Dave McCormick, voted no alongside Fetterman.

Fourteen tries, one vote short again

The war began on February 28, 2026, when the United States and Israel launched joint airstrikes against Iran. Iran answered by turning the Strait of Hormuz into a war zone, and gas, diesel, fertilizer and food prices have climbed since. NBC News reported that 19 American service members have died.

Democrats, led in the Senate by Tim Kaine of Virginia, have forced vote after vote. According to Reuters, as cited by The Center Square, Thursday’s was the 14th Senate vote on the issue, and several, including the most recent ones, were decided by one vote. In June, the Senate did adopt a separate, symbolic House-passed resolution with the same four Republicans, but a day later key Republicans shifted after meeting with Trump and the follow-up effort fell short. CBS described Thursday’s vote as the Senate’s first on the question since July and likely its last before the midterms.

Kaine made his case plainly. “It’s more than a message,” he said, adding: “Congress has the constitutional power to declare war, not the president.”

That is a fair constitutional argument, and it deserves a serious answer. But the practical question in front of the Senate was not a seminar on Article I. It was whether, in the middle of a shooting war, Congress should formally tell the commander in chief to pull American forces off the field against a regime that has spent decades chanting death to America and racing toward a bomb.

Fetterman didn’t explain. He didn’t have to.

Fetterman issued no public statement after Thursday’s vote, according to both The Center Square and CBS 21 in Harrisburg. He hasn’t needed one. He has been clear about this war from the first day.

On February 28, the day the strikes began, he shared an Axios story headlined “Democrats demand war powers vote after U.S. strikes Iran” and answered it in three short sentences: “Committed Democrat here. I’m a hard no. My vote is Operation Epic Fury.” CBS 21 reported that he has said military action is the only way to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon. It is not the first time his vote has decided one of these measures, either: when the Senate rejected an Iran war powers resolution 49 to 50 on May 13, The American Conservative reported, he voted with Republicans to stop it.

That consistency is the story. Fetterman has staked out pro-Israel and anti-Iran positions much of his party now treats as embarrassing, and the backlash at home was immediate. Rep. Chris Deluzio, a fellow Pennsylvania Democrat, wrote that “John Fetterman just cast the deciding vote to keep the Iran War raging.” State Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta of Philadelphia called him “an utter disappointment.” Former Rep. Susan Wild added: “Fetterman never fails to disappoint.”

The politics around him

None of this is happening in a vacuum. The war is unpopular. An NBC News poll found 33 percent of registered voters think it was worth it and 62 percent do not. Some Republicans in tough races, including Senate candidate Mike Rogers in Michigan and Rep. Ashley Hinson in Iowa, have started calling for a swift end. Majority Leader John Thune acknowledged “voter fatigue” over fuel prices and said he hopes the administration is “laser-focused on trying to get the strait open.”

President Trump, speaking at the United Nations, framed the stakes in terms of what a nuclear Iran would mean: “Just imagine such a vile regime were ever empowered to carry out large-scale terror attacks from behind a nuclear shield.”

That is the question every one of these votes really turns on. Congress can argue about process. The ayatollahs are not arguing about anything except how close they can get to a weapon. A one-vote message from the United States Senate telling American forces to stand down would have been heard in Tehran as exactly what it was.

The easy vote for a Democrat in a midterm year was yes. Every other Democrat who voted took it. Fetterman took the hard one, again, and again it held.

One Democrat decided that a war against the world’s leading sponsor of terror is not the moment to send Tehran a gift, and that one vote was all it took.

Sources

More from The Rothman Report

Pro-life Democrat sheriff backs Rogers and James, says his own party told him to leaveLifelong Democrat Sheriff Quits the Party After Locals Told Him to Leave for Backing Rogers and JamesA Taco Bell coworker's call stopped an alleged neo-Nazi plot against a Hindu temple.Taco Bell Coworker’s Tip Stopped a Self-Described Neo-Nazi’s Alleged Plot Against an Aurora Hindu TempleShe waited five years for a wheelchair lift. She says Veterans Affairs offered assisted dying.Paralympian Veteran Waited 5 Years for a Wheelchair Lift. She Says Canada Offered Her Assisted Death.